Top 10 Cities for Dating
(onlinedatingmagazine.com -
March 31, 2004) Is the city you call home THE place
to find that special someone? Hooking that hottie is
hard enough without the odds stacked against you, so
AXE Deodorant Bodyspray teamed with the city study
experts at Sperling's BestPlaces to find out "America's
Best and Worst Cities for the Dating Game."
Land of the Longhorn
Texas, tops the 80 largest metro areas in the study, based on criteria that
include percentage of singles ages 18-24 and dating venues per capita such
as coffee shops and bars, among others.
The Top Ten best and worst cities
for the dating game are:
1. Austin, TX
2. Colorado Springs, CO
3. San Diego, CA
4. Raleigh/Durham, NC
5. Seattle, WA
6. Charleston, SC
7. Norfolk, VA
8. Ann Arbor, MI
9. Springfield, MA
10. Honolulu, HI
The Top Ten Worst Cities to Hook Up In
1. Kansas City,
MO
2. Wichita, KS
3. Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN
4. Detroit, MI
5. Louisville, KY
6. Greensboro/Winston-Salem, NC
7. Atlanta, GA
8. Pittsburgh, PA
9. Houston, TX
10. Charlotte, NC
Interesting Facts from the Top Ten
"Large cities that everyone associates with socializing, like Los Angeles
and
Miami, did not rank particularly high, scoring lower in categories like coffee
shops per capita and flowers bought as gifts," said Bert Sperling, president
of Sperling's Best Places. "But cities like Austin (No. 1), Colorado Springs
(No. 2) and Ann Arbor (No. 8) were not a complete surprise -- they are heavy-populated
college towns and great places for young singles to get together."
1. Austin,
TX: Taking home the grand prize, Austin scores relatively high in everything,
from frequency of dating partners to the number of
establishments to meet people. Austin also has the
highest percentage of 18 - 24-year-olds and knows how
to have fun as they spent more money out socializing
than any other area
2. Colorado Springs, CO: Ranks in
the 99th percentile for socializing at bars and also
scores high in the dining out category
3. San Diego,
CA: Scores high in the diversity index, which rates
the likelihood of randomly meeting someone of a different
race or ethnicity, and, of course, San Diego is off
the charts when it comes to outdoor recreational opportunities
4.
Raleigh/Durham, NC: Has a large 18 - 24-year-old
population and a high amount of online daters in the
area
5. Seattle, WA: No surprise, Seattle has the largest
amount of coffee shops (great places for meeting
people or gathering to rehash the previous night's
activities)
6. Charleston, SC: Ranks second in the amount
of lingerie shops per capita (behind Columbia, SC)
7.
Norfolk, VA: Came in near the top due to the exceptional
amount of flowers that were brought as gifts for
a special someone
8. Ann Arbor, MI: Scores in the 98th
percentile for percentage of singles and ranks high
in the dining out category as well
9. Springfield, MA:
Springfield scores high in many categories, among
them are percentage of singles, health clubs per capita
and bars per capita in the area
10. Honolulu, HI: Honolulu
ranks first in the diversity index category, which
rates the likelihood of randomly meeting someone of
a different race or ethnicity, and scores the highest
in the dining out category as well
Better Luck Next
Time
Below are some of the reasons that large cities like
Detroit, Atlanta and Houston bottomed out in the
study.
-- Largest 18-24 population: Pittsburgh (overall
No. 73 ranking) and Detroit (overall No. 77) are
among cities with the lowest number of 18-24 year olds
--
Percentage of Singles: Charlotte, NC, (overall No.
71) is among the cities with the lowest percentage
of singles
-- Latte, Anyone?: Wichita (overall No. 79)
and Greensboro (overall No. 75) are among those cities
that are home to the least number of coffee shops per
capita, leaving few good places for young people to
converge and trade stories after a fun night out
--
Remove Earplugs: Louisville (overall No. 76) scores
low in the concert category; apparently the tour
buses are not making a habit of stopping and rocking
in Louisville
-- Necklaces and Bracelets and Rings,
Oh My: Two of the cities where jewelry is least often
bought as a gift are Detroit (overall No. 77) and Minneapolis
(overall No. 78)
-- Ooh la la!: Houston (overall No.
72) is among cities with the least amount of lingerie
shops per capita
-- Behind Bars: Atlanta (overall No.
74) is among the cities with the least amount of
hot new bars, leaving young singles looking for places
to meet potential hook ups
Methodology
AXE's "America's Best and Worst Cities for the
Dating Game" study was conducted using 24 distinct
criteria including, among others: population density,
percentage of singles, frequency of hooking up, dating
venues such as coffee shops, bars, and intimate apparel
stores and flowers and jewelry bought as gifts. The
study is based on the most currently available figures
from the Census Bureau (population characteristics
and statistics), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(frequency of sexual partners), Match.com (online daters),
and criteria from leading relationship experts who
weighed
categories in terms of dating importance.
|