| Online
Dating Magazine > Letters
to the Editor > 009
Letter to the Editor:
Upset at True.com's Deceptive Practices
I just want to warn the average folk like me who sign
up for True.com on
a whim, decide to cancel and find not only is that
difficult to do on this site, but
even when they do cancel run smack into True's deceptive
practices and more charges to their credit card.
First,
I find that you can only cancel on the phone. When
I do call and finally get through to a real person
and off of hold, I state my wish to cancel, give my
pertinent info and the customer service person tells
me that since things have been slow due to holidays
they are giving you and everyone a free month.
I restate
that I don't really care if I have more time and
that I want to cancel. Recently, I noticed a new True.com charge. Turns out, the additional time/month wasn't
a gift from the site to generously make up for a low
volume time of year, but rather a deceptive practice
to wrangle trusting victims into more financial obligations.
No mention of the need to cancel was made to me since
this month was presented as a gift, a courtesy and
since I clearly stated my dissatisfaction, disinterest
and wish to cease dealing with the site.
When I do call
to investigate and have the charges reversed...and
finally get through to a real person and off of hold...I
speak to Erin who says it is not their practice to
reverse charges and that the person couldn't have neglected
to disclose the conditions since the calls are taped
and customer service reps would get fired for that.
I ask Erin for her supervisor.
After ten minutes on
hold and an eventual transfer to the front desk and
further delay, I am successfully put through to Michael,
Erin's supervisor. He tells me the notes from the sales
rep a.k.a customer service rep wrote on my file that
he told me the conditions. I repeat the facts and am
told that there is nothing they can do but cancel the
account from this point on.
I ask for Michael's supervisor.
I am told he is it....among the staff working today.
I ask for his supervisor's name and when that person
works on the schedule. I have to ask specifically for
the supervisor's full name, and Michael can
not tell me when this person will be working next.
I
am also informed that since they would have to dig
out the recording of the call I could not wait on hold
for them to check my version against what the recording
held... I was also reassured that in any case, there
would be no reversal of charges.
I realize most people
would have hung up while waiting on hold, or at least
after getting no where fast with Michael. I believe
True.com banks on that tendency of the public to be
put off by and give up in the face of such tactics.
It would then seem they are making lots of money off
the trust of people who cancel and are mislead by salespeople
cloaked as customer reps.... and not by satisfied customers
receiving good service in a honorable business transaction.
I
wanted to write to make people aware of the deceptive
practices and give them a chance to avoid the hassle
of having to put so much time and effort into cancelling
an online dating service.
I will make another call tomorrow,
but I suspect that the named supervisor
will be unavailable and/or unable to resolve my complaint.
Obviously I do not recommend anyone bothering with
True.com. I myself have been done with online dating
sites for months...it doesn't take long to see the
problems are not worth the depressing and lackluster
results. I don't mind paying to experience and learn
for myself. I am outraged at being deceived into further
charges upon cancelling.
~ Eileen L.
<
Previous Letter | Next
Letter>
Write a Letter to the Editor
> Try Perfectmatch.com - The Best Approach to Finding the Right Person for You.
<
All
Online Dating Magazine content, including the content on this page,
is ©
copyright by Online Dating Magazine and may
not be
republished or reused in any form. You do have
full permission to link to this article.
Do you agree or disagree with this
article? Have
more to add? Submit a Letter
to the Editor today.
|