|
Office Hours With Dr. Jim
by James
Houran, Ph.D
In this column, "Dr.
Jim"
honestly and candidly answers your questions about
dating, love and sexuality. He doesn’t tell
you what you want to hear – he tells you what
you need to hear. Dr. Jim is committed to offering
you guidance based on responsible clinical practice
and hard data from the latest scientific studies.
Send
Dr. Jim your questions today for consideration
in an upcoming issue.
This
Week:
Soul Mates
Is there a such
thing as soul mates?
I recently co-authored an academic article(5) in the
North American Journal of Psychology about this topic.
I appreciate Dr. Lynn McCutcheon, editor of the journal,
for allowing me to draw from that paper to answer this
question. First, a little background. Most people define
a "soul mate" as a romantic partner who's
naturally and virtually "perfectly compatible"
across a range of relationship expectations, attitudes
and
behaviors. But, what does it mean to be perfectly compatible?
If a couple is too much alike, then one of the partners
is unnecessary. If a couple is too different, then
there is no common foundation to build a lasting relationship.
Nevertheless, a soul mate view of romance and marriage
is particularly strong among young adults – a
key age group for online dating. One study(6) found
that an astonishing 94% of single men and women, aged
20 to 29, agreed with the statement, "when you
marry, you want your spouse to be your soul mate, first
and foremost." Furthermore, this same study
also found that 88% believed that there was one person
"out there" who was specially destined to
be their soul mate. Similarly, other researchers(3)
have discovered
that people tend to be either "soul mate theorists"
or "work-it-out
theorists" and they hold these respective beliefs
are highly stable over time. Soul mate theorists believe
that finding the right person is the most important
thing for a satisfying relationship. Work-it-out theorists
believe that effort is most important thing for building
a successful relationship.
So, do these perfect partners exist? No, they don’t.
The term "soul mate" is poetic rather than
scientific. Moreover, idealized notions of a perfect
partner only reinforce unrealistic expectations people
have when they search for a mate. The way the relationship
world works is much close to the beliefs held by the
work-it-out theorists. Unfortunately, I’ve heard
some online dating companies essentially sell customers
the promise that their service will match you with
your soul mate. And, these are companies with educated
spokespeople who should know better. These are misleading
and disturbing marketing messages, in my professional
opinion.
We may feel that we have met our soul mate during
the early stages of a relationship when our brain chemistry
produces natural highs (read more about this here).
Also working in the brain is a little mental misdirection – let's
call it sleight-of-mind. This sleight-of-mind is a
basically a distorted view of your partner and the
relationship. For example, high levels of marital satisfaction
often involve positive distortions(1,2). This is a
tendency to describe your relationship in unrealistically
positive terms. In other words, you tell yourself and
others that the relationship is better than it probably
is.
This is really nothing new. Psychologists have known
about such over-inflated beliefs for many, many years.
Essentially, it’s a mindset of perceiving your
partner and your partner with the outlook of "the
glass is half full" rather than "the glass
is half empty." Some other names for this mind
set are positive illusions(9) and unrealistic optimism(7).
This outlook motivates people to regard their partners
as overly positive (or even overly negative) – depending
on the story you tell yourself using cues and information
you choose to see as well as ignore.
The dynamics of the early stages of a relationship
arguably boil down, in large part, to a self-fulfilling
prophecy(4,5). We use this mind set in many aspects
of our lives, not just our relationships. You see,
lasting and fulfilling relationships are not grounded
in physical and attraction. There are three ingredients
to successful loving relationships(8) – Friendship,
Passion and Intimacy, and a conscious Decision to Commit.
It takes those three legs to hold up a relationship
over a lifetime. So, we have a new definition of a
"soul mate," if we take ignore what we’ve
been incorrectly taught by Hollywood movies and romance
novels. The new definition is this – a soul mate
is some one with whom you can establish and grow Friendship,
Intimacy and Commitment. It seems to take a level of
similarity between a couple’s personal characteristics
to do this, as well as an element of dissimilarity
in their personal characteristics. A person finds a
soul mate when he or she finds some one that complements
them – not completes them as Jerry Maguire would
have you believe.
It’s absolutely fine to have standards, but
don’t let go of opportunities to get to know
a person online or off because he or she doesn’t
fit your "ideal" of the person you were
destined to be with. The fact is… there’s
no perfect partner and no perfect relationship. But
that's not bad news at all. With the right mind
set, this news can be inspirational. In particular,
there’s likely to be a multitude of people out
there right now that can be a "soul mate" to
you, based on how I defined the concept. You are in
control of who is and isn’t a potential soul
mate. All it takes effort is for you to play the field
and get to know others and focus on whether they have
the right recipe with you to build and maintain Friendship,
Passion and Intimacy, and a conscious Decision to Commit.
If there's a spark, then consider that the soul
mate part. After you found such a person, it's
again up to you to keep them being your soul mate.
You see, couples in successful relationships may have
started off as starry-eyed "soul mates," but
they have remained together because they evolved into
being work-it-out theorists!
References
1 Edmonds, V. H. (1967). Marital conventionalization:
definition and measure- ment. Journal of Marriage and
the Family, 29, 681-688. 2 Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H.
(1993). ENRICH marital satisfaction scale: a brief
research and clinical
tool. Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 176-185.
3 Franiuk, R., Cohen, D., & Pomerantz,
E. M. (2002). Implicit theories of relationships:
implications for
relationship satisfaction and longevity. Personal Relationships,
9, 345-367.
4 Houran, J., & Lange, R. (2004).
Redefining delusion based on studies of subjective
paranormal ideation.
Psychological Reports, 94, 501-513.
5 Houran, J., & Lange, R. (2004). Expectations
of finding a ‘soul mate’ with online dating.
North American Journal of Psychology, 6, 297-308.
6 Popenoe, D., & Whitehead, B. D. (2001). The
state of our unions: the social health of marriage
in America, 2001. New Brunswick, N J: National Marriage
Project at Rutgers University.
7 Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C.
S. (1992). Effects of optimism on psychological and
physical well being:
theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive
Therapy and Research, 16, 201-228.
8 Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of
love. Psychological Review, 93, 119-135.
9 Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D.
(1988). Illusion and well-being: a social psychological
perspective
on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
All
Online Dating Magazine content, including the content on this page,
is ©
copyright by Online Dating Magazine and may
not be
republished or reused in any form. You do have
full permission to link to this article.
Do you agree or disagree with this
article? Have
more to add? Submit a Letter
to the Editor today.
|