| Online
Dating Magazine > Columns > Dating
From the Inside Out > 73
Dating From the Inside Out
by Susan
S. Davis
Historic
Lessons of Dating
Most
people have always understood the concept of dating
from the time that they were at least young teenagers,
often earlier. Each person’s understanding
of the meaning of dating, usually is a combination
of culture, social standing, religious beliefs and
other environmental, spiritual and psychological
factors.
The
end of World War II, brought the U.S. nation to a
period of great prosperity. As a result, school attendance
until high school graduation, became the norm, rather
than the exception. This created a situation where
an unusually high number of people at a marriageable
age, were kept out of the job market. Therefore,
those who would have married earlier were now setting
their sights on higher education, and career interests,
putting marriage and family on hold.
Many
of the people of dating age,
had disposable income and time.
Add to that, the media’s
courtship of youthful romantic
rhetoric, including music,
art, film and books on the
same topic, and out of this
new cultural phenomenon, came
the birth of what we now know
as, contemporary dating.
When
the dance of courtship began,
it really was all fairly innocent.
Parental authority was still
at the forefront. Religious
values were governing most
of the mores that existed. “Dating” was
considered a way for younger
people to coexist with their
peers, and entertain themselves
in social settings, often,
including groups at a time,
to have fun and while developing
their personalities, before “settling
down” into
adult life.
Originally,
dating offered young women a chance to receive attention
from many “suitors” – usually
different ones every weekend, if things turned out well
for her. Since many young people’s circle of acquaintances
came from their church or school, under the jurisdiction
of social and parental curfew requirements, there was
little problem with getting into trouble.
If
things progressed enough between a young couple enough
so that a strong affinity developed, then the possibility
of marriage may have seemed an option worth considering.
At this point, it was customary for the couple to "go steady,” which
while short of engagement, did mean that they agreed
to be exclusive with each other.
Of
course, it was always understood, that human nature
being what it is, whenever young persons spend a
considerable a amount of time in the exclusive company
of each other, sex, engagement and marriage will
probably follow in due course.
By
the time the sixties and the seventies arrived, parental
authority was becoming less prevalent, as drugs became
more commonplace. The Sexual Revolution was becoming
more popular in society.
Meanwhile,
upward-mobility helped to transform society into
more of a transitory state. At almost the same time,
the post-Vatican II upheaval spurred on by the era
of “free love” – helped
to push away the social moorings that had once been associated
with religious and other social authorities.
While
some traditional dating rituals continued, it was
still different than it had been, and changing every
day. There were less social restraints imposed than
before, which seemed to be disappearing at a feverish
pace. People were embracing the newfound freedoms
associated with the new dating scheme, as the old
rules disappeared.
As
college campuses began to fill to the rafters, while
students adopted a militant stance to avoid the Vietnam
War, curfews, sign-ins, and other protective measures,
all in the name of freedom, were facing abolishment.
Conservative
types complained that there were fewer “decent” movies
to attend. More people seemed to rely upon cars for transportation,
which liberated them from curfews associated with mass
transit that ended at a certain time, as well as obtaining
rides in carpools and from those in authority, who, before,
could impose restrictions such as curfews easily. This
also resulted in more one-on-one, rather than group dating.
Along with the new drug culture, came parties where young
adults partook in Marijuana, LSD and other recreational
drugs, which contributed to the new looseness associated
with dating behavior, while accelerating intimacy.
The
eighties was the first decade of young people reared
on feminism and Planned Parenthood-style sex education.
While the era did a lot to help society evolve out
of some of the social shackles and stigma of the
fifties, it also could have served to destroy what
remained of chivalry, to a certain degree.
In
general, going out wasn’t cheap anymore, and females were expected
to pay their share – either monetarily, or in other
ways. It seemed to become necessary that females “reimburse” males
who spent money on them, one way or another. During the
nineties, women often advanced to become the sexual aggressors,
no longer waiting for men to approach them in public,
or being coy about their desires.
The
innocence of dating pre-1960, was apparent by the
level of births to unmarried women. Vital statistics
demonstrate that in 1960, there were only 91,000
births to unmarried women under age 20 in the entire
United States (and 502,046 to married women under
age 20). By 1991, there were 386,451 births to unmarried
women under 20, and 163,140 to married women the
same age. Of course, those statistics do not include
pregnancies in general, that may have been involuntarily
or voluntarily terminated.
The
most sobering effect of the loss of innocence within
our culture concerning dating, is the three to six
million new cases of sexually
transmitted diseases in adolescents aged 15-19 each year in the U.S. According
to statistics, there are 22 common sexually transmitted
diseases (STDs); many of which are never diagnosed.
Most of those STDs are incurable, and some are a
predisposition to cancer, and infertility.
So,
how does the history of dating affect the culture of
dating, as it exists today? There really is no going
back, and most people would probably not want to go
back in time, to more “innocent” times, largely
because it would involve losing some of the freedoms
that most of us enjoy, in terms of having more control
over our social lives.
While
certain religious groups discuss abstinence before
marriage regularly, it is highly doubtful that it
will be adopted with any popularity any time soon.
It is only common sense, that those who spend hours
and hours of unsupervised, unstructured time alone,
will advance to the natural passions of the flesh.
While
abstinence could benefit certain groups, such as
teens who find themselves in predicaments such as
contracting
STDs and unwanted pregnancies, older
single people would probably find it impractical
to adopt it. The fact remains, that in society today,
sex before marriage has become such a part of our
culture, that it now seems “strange” when
couples admit that they waited. Some popular male-advice
based publications, even go so far as to set deadlines
by which men should “receive” sex, or abandon
involvement with whomever they don’t
get it from by that time.
As
dating rituals evolve, one can only guess how they
will manifest in our society,
and how it will affect intimate
relationships as a whole.
One thing is for sure: dating
will continue to be a part
of our society, as every
relationship, no matter how
it turns out, begins with
a date.
Related Links:
» Online Dating Magazine's STD Info Center
Susan
S. Davis is a published book author
and writer, currently doing research for a romantic
screenplay she is writing. Her Dating
From The Inside Out column
is published every Tuesday.
All
Online Dating Magazine content, including the content on this page,
is ©
copyright by Online Dating Magazine and may
not be
republished or reused in any form. You do have
full permission to link to this article.
Do you agree or disagree with this
article? Have
more to add? Submit a Letter
to the Editor today.
|